Semantic Networks: How to blow a lot of time on something fairly simple.
I guess I lost the proper attitude about semantic networks deep in the explanation and discussion of it. I've always constructed these things in my head with everything I do but of course I didn't have to worry about the graphic representation of it. Don't get me wrong, I see a value in mapping out the relationships between concepts. What goes where etc. does have some validity in my book. I just don't see the value of time spent and effort expended in order to make a program spit out the proper nodes and links.
I did see some value in just playing with the Inspiration software to produce the same thing easily. For any high school class, this should be sufficient. The number of "assymetric links", "centrality" and other relational concepts within the map is nice for finding higher things but overkill for the high school classroom. Reading a chapter on such things will not make me an expert. I like the software as a neat toy to play with. However, I think I will use butcher paper to map things out then a graphics program to create a slide. No additional cost that way.
If it were to become the norm for all teachers the world over to be conversant with the sophisticated statistical knowledge of semantic network mapping and my administrators became enamored with the higher statistical relevance of such data, I'd learn it or find a new job. Probably, I'd have to find a new job because my new colleagues would have to be "vulcans" to work these things with fluency in their every day job.
Another cynical observation by yours truly!
BC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment